Valeris has, she admits with only fractional hesitation (dishonesty is, at best, unnecessary) acted against the interests of the greater organization in which she was, at the time, sworn to active service and, in furtherance of her actions, slain, twice, yet hers are not the--a particular human word for one's general moral or ethical limits is, so she understands, scruples--in question.

What you want is irrelevant; what you've chosen is at hand!

Valeris has not, numerous though her crimes may otherwise be, perpetrated a certain violence on another and, given the gravity of such an action regardless of circumstance, she finds it entirely fair to wonder just who should be considered the (better is an arbitrary term, do not use it as a measure) more suitably representative Vulcan.